David Allyn Dokich - Serial Child Rapist / High Risk Sex Offender

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Riverside Judge Bernard Schwartz reponds to judicial inquiry

Riverside Judge Bernard Schwartz has responded to the formal proceedings brought against him by the California Commission on Judicial Performance.

Count 1 was driving under the influence and count 2 was trying to avoid being arrested and trying to get special treatment because he is a judge. You can click here to read them in detail.

Here is the response by Judge Bernard Schwartz:


EDWARD P. GEORGE, JR., NC.
EDWARD P. GEORGE, JR. (Bar No. 30120)
5000 East Spring Street, Suite 430
Long Beach, California 90815-1275
Telephone: (562) 497-2900

Attorneys for Respondent,
Judge Bernard J. Schwartz



STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE


EDWARD P. GEORGE, JR., NC.
EDWARD P. GEORGE, JR. (Bar No. 30120)
5000 East Spring Street, Suite 430
Long Beach, California 90815-1275
Telephone: (562) 497-2900

Attorneys for Respondent,
Judge Bernard J. Schwartz

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE

INQUIRY CONCERNING
JUDGE BERNARD J. SCHWARTZ,

NO. 178
ANSWER OF JUDGE BERNARD J.
SCHWARTZ TO NOTICE OF
FORMAL PROCEEDINGS


COMES NOW, Respondent, Judge Bernard J. Schwartz, and answering the Notice of Formal Proceedings in the above-entitled inquiry, admits, denies and alleges as follows:

COUNT ONE

Respondent admits that on July 16, 2005, he was driving his motor vehicle with a .17 percent blood alcohol in violation of Vehicle Code Section 23152 (b).

Respondent admits that on September 6, 2005, a plea of no contest was entered to violation of Vehicle Code Section 23152 (b), in the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court, Case No. M376280.

COUNT TWO

Respondent admits the factual allegations as charged in Count Two.

Respectfully submitted



/s/
EDWARD P. GEORGE JR.
Attorney for Respondent
Judge Bernard J. Schwartz



VERIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES:

I BERNARD J. SCHWARTZ declare that:

I am the respondent judge in the above-entitled proceeding. I have read the foregoing Answer of Judge Bernard J. Schwartz to Notice of Formal Proceedings and all facts alleged in the above document not otherwise supported by citations to the record exhibits or other documents are true of my own personal knowledge.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on March 15 006 at Riverside California.

BERNARD J. SCHWARTZ
Judge - Inquiry No. 178


##

As you can see Judge Schwartz admitted his wrongdoing.

What happens now? Anything is possible, from a severe tongue lashing to a dismissal.

Source

Comment   Email to a friend



 
Google

Web dokich.blogspot.com